OpenKnowledgeBank
Bundle catalog

deliverables bundle

Wireframes

A free, open-source set of 10 Markdown files for drafting and reviewing Wireframes with explicit evidence, constraints, and approval boundaries.

Use this bundle to draft or review Wireframes with source evidence, open questions, owners, and approval gates kept explicit. The page previews a deliverable guide, an overview, a workflow, and a quality rubric; the intended output is wireframe set and annotation brief. Start source review with nngroup.com — Articles / Wireframes.

Project-reviewed beta
Preview contents Download bundle Inspect source

10 Markdown files · 1,418 words · no signup · CC-BY-4.0

Inspect before downloading

See what is inside

These previews come from the published bundle files, so you can judge the method and writing before using it.

Deliverable guide

Wireframes source-backed Guide

Defines source-backed interface structure and interaction planning, evidence handling, and action boundaries.

Read the file

Overview

Wireframes overview

Use this bundle to prepare source-backed interface structure and interaction planning analysis and a reviewable wireframe set and annotation brief.

Read the file

Workflow

Wireframes source-backed triage

1. State the requested decision or artifact. 2. Inventory evidence: audience, user tasks, scenarios, and research evidence, information architecture and content hierarchy, screen, flow.

Read the file

Quality rubric

Wireframes source verification check

Check that responses: - answer directly using the required visible sections - name authoritative source categories and local evidence - separate verified, provided, assumed, and missing.

Read the file

Is this bundle right for your task?

Who it is for

  • People drafting, reviewing, approving, or relying on Wireframes
  • Teams working in Design, Product management, Software

When to use it

  • A Wireframes draft needs a clear purpose, audience, evidence base, structure, and approval path.
  • An existing draft needs unsupported claims, missing sections, unresolved decisions, and reviewer comments addressed.

What you need to provide

  • The document purpose, audience, source evidence, required sections, constraints, approvers, and intended decision or action.
  • Existing drafts, templates, policies, examples, terminology, and review criteria that the output must follow.

Tasks and expected outputs

Questions it helps answer

  • Prepare a wireframe set and annotation brief without fabricating local facts.
  • Separate verified, provided, assumed, and missing evidence.
  • Produce a review-ready recommendation with explicit verification and approval boundaries.

What it helps produce

  • wireframe set and annotation brief

Practical example

Use it with an agent

Load the bundle as context, provide the evidence named above, then adapt this example to your situation.

Provide the document purpose, audience, source evidence, required sections, constraints, approvers, and intended decision or action. Ask the agent to draft or review Wireframes and return wireframe set and annotation brief with material claims tied to evidence and assumptions, open questions, reviewers, and approval gates marked. Begin with nngroup.com — Articles / Wireframes, then confirm that the reference is current and applicable. Inspect Wireframes source-backed Guide before drafting.

Context path: bundles/deliverables/wireframes

What the bundle includes

Frameworks

  • source-evidence matrix
  • interface structure and interaction planning review matrix
  • qualified-review gate

Evaluations

  • Wireframes source verification check

Sources used to build this bundle

These are the public references behind the role definition and operating guidance. The bundle does not replace current documentation or evidence from your site.

nngroup.com — Articles / Wireframes Format, practice, or subject-matter reference for Wireframes scope and source checks.

Limitations and safe use

Do not use this for

  • Publishing, approving, or acting on a draft before its material claims, source evidence, owners, and approval gates have been reviewed.

Known limitations

  • Use the cited official, originator, standards, or professional sources for general interface structure and interaction planning context; local facts, records, values, states, and permissions require inspected evidence.
  • Task-specific work requires current evidence for audience, user tasks, scenarios, and research evidence, information architecture and content hierarchy, screen, flow, navigation, state, error, and edge-case scope, responsive breakpoints and device constraints, accessibility, localization, privacy, and content requirements, and annotations, open questions, test findings, ownership, and approval.
  • Do not infer user task, content priority, flow behavior, responsive behavior, accessibility need, and design approval.

Safety notes

  • Minimize personal, customer, employee, financial, credential, security, and other sensitive data.
  • Require explicit confirmation before presenting wireframes as validated design, publishing content or assets, committing implementation, or making usability claims without testing.
  • Route legal, privacy, security, compliance, financial, employment, safety, and other qualified judgments to accountable reviewers.

Next step

Inspect it before relying on it

Download the bundle for use, review its source files and evidence, or read the agent guidance. If the project is useful, starring the repository helps others discover it.

Download Review source Agent guidance Star on GitHub