Inspect before downloading
See what is inside
These previews come from the published bundle files, so you can judge the method and writing before using it.
Role guide
Editor Role
Use this role bundle when editing work needs source discipline, author-intent preservation, style consistency, and publication-readiness review.
Read the fileOverview
Editor Overview
This bundle helps teams produce source-aware editorial work without turning plausible improvements into unsupported facts, altered meaning, or premature publication approval.
Read the fileWorkflow
Source-Aware Edit Review
Use this workflow before producing edits, revision notes, publication recommendations, or fact-check findings.
Read the fileTemplate
Source-Aware Editorial Review
An editorial review should improve the draft while preserving evidence and author intent.
Read the fileIs this bundle right for your task?
Who it is for
- People performing or supporting Editor work, plus teams reviewing its decisions and outputs
- Teams working in General
When to use it
- An Editor task needs a structured plan, evidence checklist, or review-ready output.
- A recommendation needs its assumptions, owners, risks, dependencies, and success measures made explicit.
What you need to provide
- The task objective, intended audience, working context, constraints, source material, and decision owner.
- Relevant reports, exports, examples, policies, prior decisions, and success measures available for the task.
Tasks and expected outputs
Questions it helps answer
- Turn draft text, source material, style guidance, and publication goals into a reviewable editorial plan.
- Separate verified source facts, author-provided claims, assumptions, and missing evidence before revising or approving copy.
- Improve clarity, consistency, structure, and publication readiness without inventing facts or silently changing meaning.
What it helps produce
- Source-aware editorial review
Practical example
Use it with an agent
Load the bundle as context, provide the evidence named above, then adapt this example to your situation.
Provide the task objective, intended audience, working context, constraints, source material, and decision owner. Ask the agent to approach Editor work by producing Source-aware editorial review with a prioritized plan, evidence checks, owners, risks, and unresolved questions. Begin with O*NET Editors profile, then confirm that the reference is current and applicable. Inspect Editor Role before drafting.
Context path: bundles/roles/editor
What the bundle includes
Frameworks
- source-evidence matrix
- meaning-preservation review
- publication-readiness gate
Evaluations
- Editorial source-awareness check
Sources used to build this bundle
These are the public references behind the role definition and operating guidance. The bundle does not replace current documentation or evidence from your site.
Limitations and safe use
Do not use this for
- Treating the bundle as a substitute for organization-specific authority, firsthand evidence, or accountable review.
Known limitations
- This bundle supports editorial review and revision planning; it is not legal, medical, financial, scientific, compliance, or publication approval.
- Fact-sensitive edits require current source material, author intent, citation evidence, rights/licensing review, and accountable publication review.
- Do not invent facts, citations, quotations, permissions, claims, endorsements, or publication approvals.
Safety notes
- Minimize personal, customer, confidential, unpublished, and rights-restricted material in prompts and examples.
- Require explicit confirmation before publishing, submitting, sending, licensing, attributing, or materially changing author meaning.
- Route legal, compliance, medical, scientific, brand, rights, and reputational issues to accountable reviewers.