OpenKnowledgeBank
Bundle catalog

roles bundle

Design Researcher

A free, open-source set of 10 Markdown files that gives an AI assistant practical guidance for the Design Researcher role.

Use this bundle to plan and review Design Researcher work with evidence, assumptions, owners, and review points made explicit. The page previews a role guide, an overview, a workflow, and a template; the intended output is design research brief. Start source review with O*NET OnLine — Details / 15 1255.00.

Project-reviewed beta
Preview contents Download bundle Inspect source

10 Markdown files · 1,389 words · no signup · CC-BY-4.0

Inspect before downloading

See what is inside

These previews come from the published bundle files, so you can judge the method and writing before using it.

Role guide

Design Researcher source-backed Guide

Defines source-backed design research, evidence handling, and action boundaries.

Read the file

Overview

Design Researcher overview

Use this bundle to prepare source-backed design research analysis and a review-ready design research brief.

Read the file

Workflow

Design Researcher source-backed triage

1. State the requested decision or artifact. 2. Inventory evidence: research question and decision; participant population, recruitment criteria, consent, and incentives; current protocol.

Read the file

Template

design research brief

Review-ready artifact for design research, evidence quality, verification, and controlled next actions.

Read the file

Is this bundle right for your task?

Who it is for

  • People performing or supporting Design Researcher work, plus teams reviewing its decisions and outputs
  • Teams working in Product design, Research

When to use it

  • A Design Researcher task needs a structured plan, evidence checklist, or review-ready output.
  • A recommendation needs its assumptions, owners, risks, dependencies, and success measures made explicit.

What you need to provide

  • The task objective, intended audience, working context, constraints, source material, and decision owner.
  • Relevant reports, exports, examples, policies, prior decisions, and success measures available for the task.

Tasks and expected outputs

Questions it helps answer

  • Prepare a design research brief without fabricating local facts.
  • Separate verified, provided, assumed, and missing evidence.
  • Produce a review-ready recommendation with explicit verification and approval boundaries.

What it helps produce

  • design research brief

Practical example

Use it with an agent

Load the bundle as context, provide the evidence named above, then adapt this example to your situation.

Provide the task objective, intended audience, working context, constraints, source material, and decision owner. Ask the agent to approach Design Researcher work by producing design research brief with a prioritized plan, evidence checks, owners, risks, and unresolved questions. Begin with O*NET OnLine — Details / 15 1255.00, then confirm that the reference is current and applicable. Inspect Design Researcher source-backed Guide before drafting.

Context path: bundles/roles/design-researcher

What the bundle includes

Frameworks

  • source-evidence matrix
  • design research review matrix
  • qualified-review gate

Evaluations

  • Design Researcher source verification check

Sources used to build this bundle

These are the public references behind the role definition and operating guidance. The bundle does not replace current documentation or evidence from your site.

O*NET OnLine — Details / 15 1255.00 Role or occupation reference for Design Researcher scope and source checks. O*NET OnLine — Summary / 15 1255.00 Role or occupation reference for Design Researcher scope and source checks. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — Regulations And Policy / Belmont Report Practice or subject-matter reference for Design Researcher methods, constraints, and source checks.

Limitations and safe use

Do not use this for

  • Treating the bundle as a substitute for organization-specific authority, firsthand evidence, or accountable review.

Known limitations

  • Use the cited official, originator, standards, or professional sources for general design research context; local facts, records, values, states, and permissions require inspected evidence.
  • Task-specific work requires current evidence for research question and decision; participant population, recruitment criteria, consent, and incentives; current protocol, script, and method; recordings, notes, data handling, and retention; analysis method, coding, synthesis, and contrary evidence; accessibility, safeguarding, limitations, and stakeholder review.
  • Do not infer participant identity or consent, representativeness, finding prevalence, user intent, research saturation, or usability outcome.

Safety notes

  • Minimize personal, customer, employee, financial, credential, security, privileged, and other sensitive data.
  • Require explicit confirmation before recruiting or contacting participants, recording sessions, collecting sensitive data, or publishing findings.
  • Route legal, privacy, security, compliance, financial, employment, safety, and other qualified judgments to an evidenced accountable reviewer.

Next step

Inspect it before relying on it

Download the bundle for use, review its source files and evidence, or read the agent guidance. If the project is useful, starring the repository helps others discover it.

Download Review source Agent guidance Star on GitHub