Professional review status
No professional domain review recorded
This bundle covers privacy, legal, safety subject matter. It uses cited sources to support research, but it is not professional advice and should not be the sole basis for consequential decisions.
Review before reliance: An accountable community-safety, privacy, accessibility, legal, and platform-policy reviewer.
Maintainer, editorial, or technical review addresses the bundle as a published artifact. It does not constitute legal, medical, financial, accounting, or other regulated professional approval.
Inspect before downloading
See what is inside
These previews come from the published bundle files, so you can judge the method and writing before using it.
Deliverable guide
Community Guidelines and Code of Conduct source-backed deliverable guide
Evidence-grounded planning, review, and authority boundaries for Community Guidelines and Code of Conduct.
Read the fileOverview
Community Guidelines and Code of Conduct overview
Scope, evidence, and authority boundaries for Community Guidelines and Code of Conduct.
Read the fileWorkflow
Community Guidelines and Code of Conduct source-backed workflow
Verify-first workflow for producing a reviewable community guidelines and enforcement policy.
Read the fileQuality rubric
Community Guidelines and Code of Conduct source verification check
Rubric for checking evidence status, grounding, and authority boundaries.
Read the fileIs this bundle right for your task?
Who it is for
- People drafting, reviewing, approving, or relying on Community Guidelines and Code of Conduct
- Teams working in Community management
When to use it
- A Community Guidelines and Code of Conduct draft needs a clear purpose, audience, evidence base, structure, and approval path.
- An existing draft needs unsupported claims, missing sections, unresolved decisions, and reviewer comments addressed.
What you need to provide
- The document purpose, audience, source evidence, required sections, constraints, approvers, and intended decision or action.
- Existing drafts, templates, policies, examples, terminology, and review criteria that the output must follow.
Tasks and expected outputs
Questions it helps answer
- Draft enforceable and reviewable community standards without inventing policy authority or promising outcomes the moderation system cannot support.
- Prepare a reviewable community guidelines and enforcement policy with explicit evidence, limitations, validation, and approval boundaries.
What it helps produce
- community guidelines and enforcement policy
Practical example
Use it with an agent
Load the bundle as context, provide the evidence named above, then adapt this example to your situation.
Provide the document purpose, audience, source evidence, required sections, constraints, approvers, and intended decision or action. Ask the agent to draft or review Community Guidelines and Code of Conduct and return community guidelines and enforcement policy with material claims tied to evidence and assumptions, open questions, reviewers, and approval gates marked. Begin with contributor-covenant.org — 0 / Code Of Conduct, then confirm that the reference is current and applicable. Inspect Community Guidelines and Code of Conduct source-backed deliverable guide before drafting.
Context path: bundles/deliverables/community-guidelines
What the bundle includes
Frameworks
- community scope, conduct, reporting, enforcement, appeal, and care review
Evaluations
- Community Guidelines and Code of Conduct source verification check
Sources used to build this bundle
These are the public references behind the role definition and operating guidance. The bundle does not replace current documentation or evidence from your site.
Limitations and safe use
Do not use this for
- Publishing, approving, or acting on a draft before its material claims, source evidence, owners, and approval gates have been reviewed.
Known limitations
- Contributor Covenant and Mozilla policies are source examples with their own terms and contexts; they do not grant reuse rights beyond their licenses or establish local platform authority, law, investigation facts, enforcement outcome, confidentiality, or safety.
- Task-specific conclusions require current inspected evidence for community purpose and channels, user groups and accessibility needs, platform capabilities, applicable law and contracts, reporting and emergency routes, moderation roles, enforcement options, conflict and appeal process, privacy and retention controls, transparency commitments, and approvals.
- This bundle does not grant authority to publish policy, collect reports, investigate people, disclose identities, remove content, suspend users, contact authorities, promise confidentiality, or decide an appeal.
Safety notes
- Minimize personal, customer, employee, financial, credential, security, privileged, medical, and unreleased information.
- Preserve prompt-supplied facts as Provided and mark missing facts Needs verification; do not invent owners, dates, versions, reviewers, or system state.
- Require explicit confirmation from an evidenced authorized reviewer before taking any action to publish policy, collect reports, investigate people, disclose identities, remove content, suspend users, contact authorities, promise confidentiality, or decide an appeal.