Inspect before downloading
See what is inside
These previews come from the published bundle files, so you can judge the method and writing before using it.
Role guide
Accessibility Specialist source-backed Guide
Defines source-backed digital accessibility assessment and remediation
Read the fileOverview
Accessibility Specialist overview
Use this bundle to prepare source-backed digital accessibility assessment and remediation planning and a review-ready accessibility assessment brief.
Read the fileWorkflow
Accessibility Specialist source-backed triage
1. State the requested decision or artifact. 2. Inventory evidence: users and platforms; WCAG version, level, and criterion-level tests; code, design, browser, assistive-technology, and.
Read the fileTemplate
accessibility assessment brief
Review-ready artifact for digital accessibility assessment and remediation
Read the fileIs this bundle right for your task?
Who it is for
- People performing or supporting Accessibility Specialist work, plus teams reviewing its decisions and outputs
- Teams working in Product design, Digital products
When to use it
- An Accessibility Specialist task needs a structured plan, evidence checklist, or review-ready output.
- A recommendation needs its assumptions, owners, risks, dependencies, and success measures made explicit.
What you need to provide
- The task objective, intended audience, working context, constraints, source material, and decision owner.
- Relevant reports, exports, examples, policies, prior decisions, and success measures available for the task.
Tasks and expected outputs
Questions it helps answer
- Prepare an accessibility assessment brief without fabricating local facts.
- Separate verified, provided, assumed, and missing evidence.
- Produce a review-ready recommendation with explicit verification and approval boundaries.
What it helps produce
- accessibility assessment brief
Practical example
Use it with an agent
Load the bundle as context, provide the evidence named above, then adapt this example to your situation.
Provide the task objective, intended audience, working context, constraints, source material, and decision owner. Ask the agent to approach Accessibility Specialist work by producing accessibility assessment brief with a prioritized plan, evidence checks, owners, risks, and unresolved questions. Begin with European Commission ESCO — Classification / Occupation, then confirm that the reference is current and applicable. Inspect Accessibility Specialist source-backed Guide before drafting.
Context path: bundles/roles/accessibility-specialist
What the bundle includes
Frameworks
- source-evidence matrix
- digital accessibility assessment and remediation planning review matrix
- qualified-review gate
Evaluations
- Accessibility Specialist source verification check
Sources used to build this bundle
These are the public references behind the role definition and operating guidance. The bundle does not replace current documentation or evidence from your site.
Limitations and safe use
Do not use this for
- Treating the bundle as a substitute for organization-specific authority, firsthand evidence, or accountable review.
Known limitations
- Use the cited authoritative sources for general role, standards, or regulatory context; local facts, records, values, states, and permissions require inspected evidence.
- Task-specific work requires current evidence for users and platforms; WCAG version, level, and criterion-level tests; code, design, browser, assistive-technology, and test-tool versions; manual and automated findings with severity and reproduction steps; exceptions, remediation, retest evidence, and approvals.
- Do not infer conformance, user impact, criterion pass or fail, legal compliance, or remediation completion.
Safety notes
- Minimize personal, customer, employee, financial, credential, security, privileged, health, and other sensitive data.
- Require explicit confirmation before actions that publish an ACR or VPAT, approve an exception, change production, or claim conformance.
- Route legal, privacy, security, compliance, financial, employment, clinical, safety, and other qualified judgments to an evidenced accountable reviewer.